There is little that divides people more than the issue of social welfare. People either believe that the government has a responsibility to its citizens, and that responsibility includes ensuring that everyone has a minimum standard of life. Typically, that includes food, a place to live, and medical care. Others believe that everyone is responsible for their own quality of life. Rather than letting the government use tax money to subsidize food, housing, and insurance for people, people should keep more of their own money and use it to pay for those.
People that support social welfare tend to be liberal and Democratic. They support programs like welfare, low-income housing assistance, WIC, and food stamps. When looking at the tax breakdown, it turns out that a relatively small percentage of tax money goes towards these programs. That’s a main debate point for Democrats; voters spend more on schools, roads, and politicians’ salaries than they do social welfare.
Conservative Republicans typically are not in favor of social welfare programs. Although they make up a small part of the taxes people pay, its still money that citizens are paying for other people. They believe that in these hard times, people can barely support their own families; their taxes should not be supporting other people and their families. Opponents of social welfare also claim that those who receive government assistance become dependent on it. They may have trouble finding work or becoming financially stable, since doing so means losing government benefits. Instead, opponents of social welfare suggest that the government encourage people o find jobs, learn to live at or below their means, and in doing so support themselves.
Social welfare is not an issue that will go away anytime soon. As long as there are people who cannot provide their families with basic necessities, there will be voters who want to give them those necessities and voters who do not want to pay for them.









