Why Many Americans Dislike Politicians

NEW LONDON, CONNECTICUT - OCTOBER 12: Mike Tur...

Image by Getty Images via @daylife

Politicians are increasingly becoming a despised group. Opposing politicians often use negative campaigns to discredit each other rather than focus on the issues at hand. Many Americans are resistant to believing anything politicians say and have strong dislike for politicians overall. Here are some reasons why many Americans dislike politicians.

  • Disparity in Priorities

In a book written by E.J. Dionne, Jr. titled “Why Americans Hate Politics,” the author discusses that the Republic and Democratic party are still caught up in debates left over from the 1960′s such as women’s role in the family. Most Americans have moved on from this issue and are more concerned with things like adequate childcare for working mothers. This disparity in priorities leads many people to dislike politicians because they don’t seem to care about what’s important them.

  • Unfulfilled Promises and Distrust

You have all seen election campaigns where politicians discuss what they will do once elected to office. Unfortunately, some politicians use empty promises to get elected and once elected they fail to deliver on their promises. Additionally, the media is more focused on the bad politicians than they are the good politicians, which only fuels the contempt that Americans have for politicians. Unfulfilled promises create distrusts and a feeling of “all politicians are professional liars.”

  • Political Scandal

Some Americans are probably getting desensitized to political scandals like extramarital affairs and corruption. Although behaviors like extramarital affairs are done by many Americans, people do not want to see their elected officials violate society’s moral standards. When these ideals are violated, it creates lack of respect and dislike for politicians.

 

Corporate Mobility, Politics And You

In an era of professional business practices, corporate functioning encompasses varied levels of people to people interactions. In such circumstances proper labor management principles become foremost in giving corporate mobility a new dimension. It’s noteworthy to mention that corporate functioning involves politics within workforce in various levels. Such politics often appears due to mixed functioning of hierarchy levels as well as individual sensation of prosperity. Such politics need to be studied in detail to keep hierarchy functioning at optimum levels.

Corporate politics is often practiced to retain individual hierarchy levels as well as garner individual reward system. For an example it can be well quoted that a person holding a specific hierarchy level may sometimes be challenged by an upper level where he or she often gets forced to employ political dimensions to uphold his or her responsibilities and actions. Thereafter such a political employment needs to be properly balanced so as to keep the corporate environment sustainable. It should be noted that an employee whose actions are influenced by political models often suppresses individual success parameters and hypes the individual reward patterns may sometimes be detrimental to business practices. In such a case, proper behavioral practices need to be implemented to curtail such political influencing.

The best practiced solution levels to corporate influence of politics are to be aggressive in your actions. You must be highly disciplined, flawless in your working parameters and cunning in your communication levels to optimize a positive message across negative actions. You must be prepared to give equal judgment to all corporate hierarchies irrespective of levels and working cultures. Such message is crucial to strengthen your position in corporate politics. This will produce a positive impact on your mentors and seniors who will automatically reprieve you of future political influencing. Such is surely to bring success in corporate mobility.

Formation Of Societies In Ancient India

Man is a social animal. He loves to live in group and interact with people. Man cannot survive a solitary confinement. In pre-historic days, primitive man used to hunt in groups. This fact of being in group was that they felt stronger against the animals and the animals would not attack them. This feeling of security led to creation of society. Society can be defined as a place where the humans live together and are bound by certain rules and the norms laid down by the society. Over a period of time the societies evolved. In historic days societies were formed on basis of one’s occupation. These societies were guild based societies.

People pursuing the same occupation came together and helped each other to prosper. They decided who could trade within the society; a new comer had to get an approval from merchant guilds before being able to start selling of his goods. However with the changing times, the way the societies functioned also changed. Children were forced to follow the same occupation as that of their parents. This led to different sections in the society. Now the society became based on the caste system. There were four different castes in ancient India. The Brahmins, the Kshatriyas, The vaishyas and the Shudras. Brahmins were the learned group of people.

They would live their lives by performing different spiritual ceremonies for the well being of people. Brahmins were the most respected people in the society and were considered to be more knowledgeable. The next in the order were the Kshatriyas or the warriors. These were the individuals from the royal family and the people who served in the royal armed forces. Kshatriyas were the born warriors and their responsibility was to protect the citizens and the society. Third in the order were the vaishyas or the merchant class. These individuals made their living by trading. This class was supposed to be wealthy class. The last category was Shudras or the downtrodden that lived by doing odd jobs in societies. Society evolved further and changed the norms completely.

Can Social Media Be A Champion In Political Causes?

Politics has always been a bewildering domain which brings in mixed functionalities in its working palette. Various technological innovations have added spices to political existence thereby catapulting an effect in its functioning. Recent political happenings have seen the rise of various types of media in giving political events a new meaning altogether. In such a spectrum, the contribution of social media and its powers in establishing political mileage is of optimum importance. Recent political fire in Egypt and Tunisia have seen the involvement of various social media sites like Facebook, Twitter, etc produce groundbreaking debates and discussions. Such networking has indeed been successful in the spread of messages and concern to the global audience.

Particularly the involvement of cross media verticals in Egypt has seen immeasurable success rate. The rage against the termination of social networking in Egypt saw violent protestors turning in thousands to topple the dictatorial administration at large. Such importance of social media linkage to politics has been instrumental in creating a positive message to the global audience. This has fostered greater awareness levels at various sections relating to political models. The development of internet has fastened the way of political awareness and strengthened democratic pillars. It has certainly given the common man a powerful tool to connect to their political leaders and raise their voices whenever necessary.

There is no existence of a perfect world order where politics assumes its true meaning of working for the good of people. We live in an imperfect world system burdened with political disorders and corruption practiced at the highest levels. Such tyranny can surely be reduced at least to some levels if the knowledgebase of the commons can be increased via interactions in social media platforms. Dissemination of information among the masses have seen the Egypt political uprising been a success story.

A Perfectly Palin Christmas List

christmas list
Image by Hjem via Flickr

As the indomitable Sarah Palin rises once again to the fore of American politics, we take a tongue in cheek look at the possible Christmas list of those who aspire to emulate her ideals.

High Price Gifts for Palin People

If you are shopping for a supporter of Sarah Palin and have an unlimited budget, then why not invest in a second home in her home-state of Alaska. Alaska makes a great holiday destination with stunning scenery and surroundings and also provides ample opportunities for outdoor pursuits of the Palin preference – with hunting and fishing top on the lists of many visitors and excellent areas available to indulge in both.

Mid Price Gifts for Palin People

While many housewives and mothers across the United States will be looking for a box housing something from Scott Kay Jewels under their tree, supporters of Sarah Palin might prefer their Christmas gift to be sourced from Smith and Wesson. Every Sarah Palin supporting woman should own her own revolver, allowing her to feel empowered in these tough modern times.

However, if a hand gun seems a little too much fire power for the Sarah-supporter in your life, why not try another track and invest in a real life bulldog, which can not only provide protection but will also act as an ongoing reminder of the lady you love’s idol.

Economy Gifts for Palin People

If your budget won’t stretch to a hunting lodge, a pedigree pup or a personal firearm, then you will need to think outside the box to provide a bit of Palin-inspired Christmas spirit. Suggestions include, of course, a gift wrapped lipstick – as a nod to the political Amazon’s constantly made-up appearance. Or why not take out a subscription to a periodical devoted to outdoor activities such as hunting and fishing, allowing your loved one to get up to scratch on Palin-esque pastimes.

Putting Mothers First

A mother holds up her child.
Image via Wikipedia

Childbirth and expectant mothers are one of the many points of interest in world health care and political referendums. There are at least 200 million women worldwide that would love to be able to use contraceptives but do not have the proper care to be able to access them. According to experts, if this were possible then deaths by childbirth could decrease by 30% or more. Not only that but deaths of newborn babies would lessen by approximately 20% ore more. There is more than just contraceptive care to think about. Millions need postnatal care, newborn care, child health care and help on safe childbirth as well as immunization needs.

There is recent proof that there has been progress made with the health care of expecting mothers and that countries that do not have access to the care that wealthy countries may have are having a big impact on decision makers that are involved with economics. Maternal health care is an investment that has to be a top priority.

There are many challenges when it comes to fiscal economics that these countries have to make and there are many trade-offs but most feel that these cannot be made at the expense of expectant mothers, children and women who need access to contraceptives and health care. This is an investment that is important to allow these countries to be more powerful and have healthier families so that the long term rewards will pay off financially as well as morally.

There have however, been very successful strides in third world countries that have focused on making health care for women a priority and their numbers have increased and decreased in the right direction. It will take much more work and financial responsibility to keep these numbers in the right direction in other countries as well.

C616BC3A-FDBA-136B-3B43-2AF498A0B9E4

1.02.28

Enhanced by Zemanta

How an Impeachment Works

Impeachment is a term we may hear quite often but may not realize exactly how it works or what happens during the process. In a government area, an impeachment takes place when a government official of a higher ranking is accused of something illegal and can be removed from that particular job. They can even be sentenced to prison time if the offense is serious enough. This process is not decided by voters like a recall election but instead is initiated by the legislature and is usually over a serious crime, not a simple infraction.

The impeachment process is actually in the constitution and states that a government official of a high ranking can be taken out of that office if they have done something bad or illegal. For this to start correctly, there has to be a formal charge or charges made against the person to be impeached. These are then studied by a prosecutor independent of the situation that is elected by the attorney general and house judiciary committee.

There is a report that is given to the house of representatives that is very detailed in nature. If this process is to continue to a hearing the articles are now considered what is called the Articles of Impeachment.

There are two outcomes of the beginning process; inquiry in the case or a direct resolution. Each are quite the opposite of each other. One asks for a direct vote to impeach and the other inquires about the appropriateness of the impeachment. By the constitution, the senate has the power to decide the outcome of the impeachment although a conviction means there has to be quite a bit of proof before a decision is made.

The entire process is quite complicated at times and is a serious matter that is taken into a lot of consideration before it is implemented.

Enhanced by Zemanta

United States and Immigration

The act of entering a country illegally is what illegal immigration is and this can happen a couple of ways. One way is to come to a country without necessary and valid documents. The other way is to overstay your welcome. This means that you are allowed to remain in the country for a certain length of time and stay longer than that time. In 2008, there were approximately over 10 million illegal immigrants in the country and presumably, most come from Mexico with the rest coming from Latin American countries, Central American countries and Asian countries.

There are a few facts that showcase the cons of illegal immigration in the United States. There are more that 600 people arrested each day in Arizona that are illegal aliens and this state of Arizona has over 6 million illegal immigrants alone, not to mention the rest of the country.

Many believe that it is okay to come to the United States as an immigrant but it is not okay to do it illegally. While one can understand why a person would leave a dangerous or poor country to come to America, most simply want it done the legal way by obtaining citizenship and going through the proper channels to get here. Obviously, there are others who don’t want immigrants here at all but it is important to remember that America is a melting pot of social differences, cultural differences and these come from other countries and their people.

This is a very hot topic for most and there doesn’t seem to be a lot that can be done to stop it however it can be lessened with the proper rules and laws put into place. It is believed that if illegal immigrants went about things the right way by getting their citizenship, not as many people would have adversity to them.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Money and Running for Office

How much does the amount of money a political candidate has play into the success or failure of running for office? Can an American citizen who’s outside the political arena or who doesn’t have personal wealth successfully campaign and win an election?

It appears more and more that politics is becoming a game of money instead of based on issues and concern for the country. The 2010 governor’s race in California is a good example. Candidate Meg Whitman, former CEO of eBay, has broken that state’s record on campaign spending by outlaying close to $90 million with the race still months from conclusion. Estimates put her personal contribution to the campaign close to 90 percent of what’s been spent so far. Her campaign’s spending is over seven times what her opponents have spent on their campaigns. Critics point out that Whitman could have done much to help California’s budget crisis and the state’s citizens instead of spending the money on negative ads, chartered jets with top-notch service, high-end fundraisers in Beverly Hills and high-salary political consultants. (Mike Murphy, the candidate’s chief consultant, reportedly makes $90,000 per month.) Other opponents accuse Whitman of deciding on a whim to run for office after she left eBay.

But the spending appears to be working, at least during the primary election. Whitman won over her main opponent Steve Poizner who accused Whitman of blatantly buying the election. She’ll be pitted against the Democratic candidate, former California governor Jerry Brown, who is known for his fiscally conservative public and private values. As of July 2010, the two are tied in the race for governor.

And don’t expect to see any third parties having much success at the polls. It’s difficult for them to compete with the highly funded Democratic and Republican parties. Third party candidates have been trying to work their way into the American political scene for years. The most well known are the Independent, Progressive, Libertarian and Green parties. But only two percent of the third party candidates in the past nine years have won their elections.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Government Energy Policy

Title: Offshore Description: Offshore platform...
Image via Wikipedia

The United States has always had an energy policy, but when the oil crisis occurred in 1973, having a thoughtful and forward-looking policy on energy and finding new sources became more critical. During the crisis, which resulted in an oil embargo, people lined up at gas stations—some trails of cars stretching on for blocks–to fill their tanks. For perhaps the first time in American history—outside of war times—people were talking about conservation. It was at this time that the Federal Department of Energy was formed. Its mission was to find ways to conserve oil and gas and to promote new energy sources. A nationwide speed limit of 55 miles per hour was established, and the CAFÉ, or Corporate Average Fuel Economy, standards were put into place to reduce automobile size and increase fuel efficiency. Also as a result of the oil crisis, the government required states to establish year-round daylight savings time, and it created the strategic petroleum reserve, the use of which is debated among Congress and the public whenever a national crisis occurs.

The majority of the oil consumed in the United States is in the form of fuel for cars, trucks, trains, airplanes and buses. Biofuel is becoming more popular, and the Senate introduced the Biofuels Security Act in 2006, which would discontinue over time our vehicles that run only on gasoline or diesel and be replaced by vehicles that can run on a variety of fuels. They hoped to have production of current automobiles phased out by 2016, but the legislation was still pending in mid-2010.

Not only the federal government decides energy policy, but state and local governments as well make decisions regarding the production of energy, its distribution and how it will be consumed. The policies can include subsidies and incentives for the public or for business, gas mileage criteria, speed limits and taxes.

Enhanced by Zemanta